A Storm is Comming....Fast

Patriotism is a funny thing these days.  We have Tea-Party Patriots, we have Civil Patriots, we have Democratic Patriots, we even have high-crime patriots (Edward Snowden being one example).  Each of us is a patriot in our own way.  This is a shout-out to my good friend Kyle Wolfe, who, today, in solidarity with his other organizers was among one of the 120 people arrested in the North Carolina State Assembly for failing to disperse when ordered.  Today the North Carolina Legislature is considering several very controversial bills. A few of the most serious ones are SB 666 which would prohibit parents of dependent students from claiming said student if he votes in a jurisdiction outside the state where he or she is attending college or university.  Then there's the legislation that threatens to cut off unemployment benefits to over 71,000 families across the state, as well as laws about hydraulic fracturing, and a few other bills.  Today, the participants in these "Moral Monday" demonstrations have drawn over 3,000-5,000 protesters to the state capital and has put North Carolina in the national spotlight.  In speaking with Kyle, he told me "its weird I'm PROUD of being arrested."  

Like many other states in this legislative session, almost all the legislatures being picketed, demonstrated, and canvassed for their radical views and policies, most are from heavily Republican-controlled states.  Recently, Wisconsin saw it's own drama when the President of the State Senate shouted obscenely at Democratic Senators because they attempted to call attention back to the debate they desired on a highly controversial abortion bill requiring a vaginal ultrasound.  The speaker shouted at opponents of the bill whom, they believe rushed the bill to a vote shutting down all debate on the legislation abruptly.  In that instance, he broke his gavel while trying to maintain order in the chamber.

The Texas Legislature attempted to pull a fast one on the public by calling a special session of the Legislature to attempt to steamroll sweeping anti-abortion legislation through the House and Senate before anyone could blink.  But currently, at this time, Senator Wendy Davis is mounting a good old-fashioned, 13 hour filibuster of the original kind, standing without the right to a break or to lean on anything and speak until the time to vote on the bill expires as 12-Midnight, local time.  The move was spawned from a public-organized citizens' filibuster where hundreds of people piled into committee meetings to speak publically about the anti-abortion legislation that would essentially close 37 of the 40 abortion clinics in the state, leaving millions of women without access to women's health care services and abortion services, as well as cutting off all of Western Texas entirely.  We'll have to see of Ms. Davis is successful in her efforts at the end of the day.

Washington State has drawn it's own Republican backlash as Republicans, who make up 95% of the Majority Coalition Caucus, a bipartisan (used loosely) collaborative body of 24 Republicans and 2 renegade Democrats who have chosen to caucus together forming a majority even though Democrats technically have the most members present, are threatening a state-shutdown of government due to severe differences in taxation and spending...most of which revolves around the Estate Tax and education funding provisions.  Republicans are demanding that the money being invested in Education not go to teacher salaries, while Democrats are objecting fervently at the attempt to squelch teacher pay increases.  And recently, a member of the The People's House, Republican Liz Pike from the 18th Legislative District, came under harsh criticism for sounding off on her views regarding teachers on her Facebook page, by posting this Open Letter:

A life in the day of a WA State Representative...
I spent the morning answering emails from constituents. I receive a lot of emails from teachers complaining about their cost of living increases being suspended. 
Here's an open letter to public educators!
Congratulations on enjoying your last day of the school year. If I had the opportunity to choose my career all over, I would have opted to get the necessary degree and teaching certificate so that I too could enjoy summertime off with my children, spring break vacations, christmas break vacations, paid holidays, a generous pension and health insurance benefits.
Instead, I chose to work a career in private sector business so that I could be one of those tax payers who funds your salaries and benefits as a state employee in a local school district.
First, let me be clear, thank you for your service to our schools. I hope you are one of the excellent instructors who is inspiring our children to reach their full intellectual potential and learn the value of true leadership in our community. I hope you are one of the brightest and best in your teaching profession who is willing to raise the bar in our public education system that unfortunately continues to plummet when compared to worldwide education standards. The big difference between the U.S. public education system and others in the world is that we have unions that only care about the adults in the system. Since the rise of teachers' unions in this nation, our public education system has deteriorated. 
I always encourage folks to choose a job they love! If you are uninspired because of the lack of a cost of living increase, I encourage you to speak with your neighbors who work in the private sector. Ask them when was the last time they were guaranteed pay increases that were not based on performance standards. Furthermore, teachers who are dissatisfied with their pay and benefits should look for work elsewhere so that someone who is inspired to greatness can take their place in the classroom. Our children deserve an exceptional and inspired teacher in every classroom. Don't you agree?
If you look at all the possible things the state can do for its citizens, you will quickly realize there will never be enough money for all of the programs that some legislators want. Just like you and I do in our own household budgets, so must the legislature. For me, it's all about priorities and spending less money that the state takes in. If we do this, we will have a reserve for emergencies and economic downturns so that we can avoid raising yet more taxes.
I am a State Representative with core values in smaller, more efficient government, more personal responsibility and less reliance on government in our everyday lives. My positions were clearly stated in my year long campaign before I was elected and they should come as no surprise.
To every excellent teacher in Clark County. Thank you for the great work you are doing in our classrooms. Enjoy your summer!
Liz PikeWashington State House of Representatives18th Legislative District"Protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness"

This unleashed a firestorm of responses from across the state about her indignation towards educators and the Education and Teaching unions who are constantly fighting with the legislature for more funding for the state's already impaired Education system.  This also following a Supreme Court Ordered increase in funding to meet the state's constitutional obligation to provide public education to it's citizens.

Across the nation, citizens and Republican-Controlled legislatures are either gridlocked or clashing horribly as unpopular, pro-business, anti-gay, anti-woman, anti-human measures are passed through these houses.  Only time will tell if this backlash will allow Republicans to survive the 2014 elections.

The Free Market and Libertarians

There was one thing that John Maynard Keynes understood about people is their nature.  Keynes was a keen observer of humans and often made remarks about them in his discourses with other people.  In particular, he had an affinity for hands.  It's weird, but, we all have our quirks that help to define us in some mild way.  But in the realm of understanding human nature, Keynes understood the instability of the human condition which, I believe, helped shape his views about government interventionism.  Keynes argued often that Capitalism was necessary but unstable, and required a hedge against severe shocks to the system.  This is where the ideal of government interventionism comes into play.  The government is the only entity large enough in the economy to affect any form of influential change to the market and the only investor large enough to stabilize supply shocks or credit shortages.

Libertarians would have you believe that we should turn over all our policing force to the private sector.  They argue that supply and demand can solve all problems and that markets will adjust themselves in time.  And on a micro-level I believe this to be true as well, however, on the macro-stage, the rules are different.  When a shock occurs to a region vs. a nation, the regional economy can seek resources out of state or out of region to help stabilize the markets that have been shocked.  A sudden drop in the supply of coffee in the area can cause a price increase, but, with the interstate markets like they are, obtaining a new supply of coffee is relatively easy.  However, when the entire national market is affected by a supply shock...say the price of oil spiking to unabsorbable levels like what happened in the 70s, the sudden shock on a macro-scale can be too much for the market to absorb and the government would need to take steps to stabilize the supply shock.  Government interventionism isn't about seizing control of the market, but taking steps to ensure that it doesn't collapse in on itself.  As Europe is finding out that the lack of public investment and stimulus spending, which is designed to give demand a crutch until the private sector can take over, is harming their economic growth substantially.  Many Euro-zone states are in recession because the ECB (European Central Bank) has been very tight-lipped with the money supply.  Partially responsible are the Germans because they're currently the nation who is in charge of the bloc's money supply.  Normally these nations in Europe would take their own currency, spend on public investment, run some short-term deficits, cause a smidge of inflation, and everybody would be back to full employment only after a few years.

Libertarians have another story.  It has been my observation that Libertarians tend to sharply moralize the market believing that any government involvement in their lives is immoral, and that the assertion that anyone should pay for anyone else is objectionable.  Now if I were to come up to you in the street, say to you "Give $10 to that guy in front of you and pay for his groceries or be jailed."  You'd look at me and say "get bent" or some variation of that.  I think most rational people would.  However, if I were to come up to you and everyone else in society and say "Please provide $10 so we can build a bridge for everybody to use."  You'd perhaps be a bit more sympathetic to that because the money is being used to build a good that everybody can use.  Or, sticking with the example of groceries, "Please provide $10 so that we can provide food to a family that's impoverished so they don't starve and end up on the streets."  Most people would find that to be at least reasonable on the premise that nobody believes anybody should starve.  Libertarians place an unreasonable amount of optimism and faith in people in business to provide for all our needs.  And while the sentiment may be noble or even somewhat rational to a limited degree, it's not logical.

By placing our faith in business and the private sector to provide our needs exclusively, including poverty services and charity, we are depending on a system that can change at a moment's notice.  The benevolence of an individual is dependent on that individual choosing to engage in an activity that is directly against his interest and being happy to do so.  And while we do have examples of individuals rising above their own wants and giving away vast amounts of money, it wouldn't provide the necessary stability to sustain and assist in rebuilding a person's life.  In the world today, there are dozens of individuals who have demonstrated great generosity.  But I fail to see examples of full-blown social poverty programs that are privately run that have been notable in helping people from rags to self-sufficiency.

Most Left-Liberals (which I identify as), argue that problems such as hunger, homelessness, and poverty affect society to a greater degree than asking for a little money to help those who have nothing.  The argument is that a starving person will follow their most basest instinct...to survive.  And to survive, most human beings will do whatever is necessary to preserve their corporeal existence.  Starvation, severe inequality, classist social mechanisms and severe injustice are the root causes of political uprisings, and, while I believe we're definitely not to that point, I do believe that if we continue on the course we're on now, specifically in regards to business and economics, we may reach that boiling point.

Wealth inequality will continue to have a toxic effect on our society as long as it remains an unsolved problem.  The fear that many progressives had during the 1890s is that the corporate machine would exceed government power, and impose itself on the citizenry as the defacto true government.  The Mr. Monopoly Cartoon is a perfect example, shown above.  This sparked the Sherman and Anti-Trust acts of the early 1900s, and has been the basis for government regulating wealth distribution and concentrations of political, economic and monetary power.  The Sherman and Anti-Trust acts were responsible for the breakup of Standard Oil, Ma Bell, and several other super-large firms which threatened to unseat the duly elected government of the people.  Maybe not through revolutionary means, but by way of becoming so large that their departure from the economic stage would cause a severe disruption to society, therefore making their presence more important and their needs more important than that of the people.

There is no evidence historically or even anecdotally that the Free Market as Libertarians contend it to be have any interest in furthering the interests of anyone except those that consume their products, buy their stock, and seek their company for employment.  There has been no notable private interest that has taken the initiative to care for the poor in any great capacity that would be necessary to abolish the social safety net.  And what few private interests are present are too small to carry the entire burden by themselves.  Government-assistance programs are necessary to help move people out of the cycle of poverty and into a position where they can meet their basic needs then move to greater levels of need hierarchies.  The Libertarian view of society is an idealism, unrealistic, and naive.  The only real solution is a blending of private market forces with government oversight managing and responsibly regulating the activities of business to protect the interests of the people, and to ensure that government of the people is the only government present.

~FIN

State Senator Mary Lazich Is Using “Lack of Education” excuse to restrict abortion while voting for those measures which cut those requirements from WI's Sex-ed laws.

Today the Wisconsin State Senate passed SB206 requiring women to obtain an ultrasound when seeking a pregnancy termination procedure.  State Senator Mary Lazich argued fervently on the senate floor that such procedures are necessary and proper because they fully educate the woman about her body, her pregnancy, and her developing fetus…giving the mother a “last chance” moment before she proceeds with her termination.  She remarked often that patients are told “you're doing the right thing” and “it’s just a cluster of cells.” 

However, there is some severe hypocrisy regarding Ms. Lazich statements and her voting record.  While Ms. Lazich is pushing for more education about human development so that mothers can make informed decisions about their bodies, she actively opposed such education by voting for SB 237 which did the following things to Wisconsin’s Sex education framework, including removing provisions which required medically accurate information regarding topics such as pregnancy, puberty, parenting, body image, sexuality, and sexual behavior. 

Ms. Lazich has repeatedly sought to take money from public education and divert it to vouchers which further the cycle of sex education ignorance as most private religious schools teach abstinence-only education and do not properly educate women about how their bodies function.  In the 2011-2013 budget passed by the Republican-dominated House and Senate, and signed by the Administration, the Administration took $1.6 Billion dollars from public and charter school education and diverted it to vouchers for kids to attend private religious schools.  Her voting yes for AB 40, the 2011-2013 budget, we again see Ms. Lazich is using the “ignorance of women about pregnancy” excuse while at the same time gutting public education and passing archaic provisions regarding the sex education requirements and mandates which include pregnancy education; requirements that Ms. Lazich is so profoundly concerned about suddenly now that she has a chance to trample on other women’s abortion rights.

Ms. Lazich is a political opportunist who’ll take advantage of every option she has to push her regressive and oppressive agenda regarding women’s health and medicine.  Her actions today speak profoundly to her character and cold-heartedness.  In her attempt to limit women’s healthcare access, she has turned herself into a flip-flopper and has blamed, what she perceives to be, the problem on an issue that she herself has caused and further perpetuated.

Bigoted Prayers are not Prayers

I am an LGBT Christian, and while I appreciate prayers as much as the next person. I like encouragement and positive reinforcement as well as sympathy and empathy. However, what I do not want is your prayers that I "get fixed" or that I "find the right girl." I do not want prayers about ridding the "evil" within me or "cleansing me of my unrighteous perversion." If you pray for me for those things...just stop...seriously. I don't want those kinds of prayers on my behalf, I don't want your prayers rooted in fear and bigotry, and I don't want your prayers about my alleged, what you view as, perversion. I am perfectly content with who I am. Nothing in this world, The Bible, or my thoroughly well-grounded understandings of scripture will convince me that I am "living in sin" because I want to spend the rest of my corporeal existence with a man. Please take your bigoted, hateful, ignorant, and thoroughly unChristian prayers, and shove them somewhere dark, dank and dreary so they rot into nothingness. Whatever happens in my life is mine to deal with. All I want is your love unconditionally...and nothing more. PERIOD. I'm growing VERY tired of walking on eggshells around people because they get upset by me talking about what is my very genuine and personal feelings about MY life. And I hate being made to feel that my feelings and desires are this facade that is influenced by Evil. I will not have my life, feelings, and experiences judged by you, or anybody else. YOU ARE NOT QUALIFIED! IT IS ABOVE YOUR PAYGRADE! Christians

I've never personally been to "anti-gay" therapy, and I never will go.

who judge are like hourly supervisors flexing their pitiful excuse of an existence to make themselves feel superior. I'd rather hold out for word from a higher-level manager...so if you seek to judge me...take a long walk of a short pier, cau
se I'm done with you.

Yes, my thoughts are rather harsh, and direct, and blunt...but you know what else...I want to feel like a human being. And I do not feel like one because I fear every day that something will happen that will severely disrupt my current life

Jesus Mandates That We Coexist

            I’m sure many of you have seen some version of this bumper sticker.  Many people recoil at seeing it because it contains symbols of various faiths, religions, and philosophies.  I especially see objections to it from Christians.  But to be fair, I live in the US where Christianity is prevalent and widespread.  But often when I see people object to “COEXIST”, I question…why do you object to that?

            To answer that question, first let is look at the ideology that fuels that particular point of view from the Christian point of view. 

1) John 14:5-7 – Thomas said to him, “Lord, we don’t know where you are going, so how can we know the way?” Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you really know me, you will know my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him.”

            This verse has often been used mistakenly to infer that Jesus is the absolute authority on everything in the world and that followers must be hostile to other philosophies.  Now in the context of the Christian Walk, this verse says that to follow Christianity, you must follow me.  And to follow me, you follow The Father who resides in me.  It’s a confusing verse and definitely warrants additional study to really get into the meat and potatoes of what Christ is trying to say.  But, it’s definitely clear that this verse is not calling for Christians to be hostile to other faiths, religions and philosophies.  Christianity has had its share of cross-cultural pollination.

            I'm sure this may get me in trouble for inferring that Christianity isn't the only way to "salvation", but, here's my honest opinion.  If your only concern is what's happening after you die, then you are not serving for the right reasons, and your works are useless.  Your works express your faith and the Love of Christ.  To do good because you want to avoid pain means that you serve out of coercion and fear, not out of a genuine heart of service.  Who cares about the end, when the Message of Christ is always concerned wit the here and now.

Matt 6: 25-34 (Heavily paraphrased)

            Worry not about tomorrow, for today has enough worries of it's own.  For if the Lord provides for the beasts of the field and the birds of the air and every little thing that crawls upon the Earth, how much more shall he provide for you?

2) 1^st Corinthians 15:33 – Do not be misled: “Bad company corrupts good character.” 

            Again, this verse is often used to justify hatred or loathing or distrust of those following other religions.  Paul was speaking to the Corinthians who were quite the party-goers and really didn't have or care to have any self-control or restraint when enjoying the pleasures of the world.  Often times, those who may try to walk the path and associate with those who do not may get pulled into their less-than-noble behaviors.  However, this does not apply to those of other faiths or religions.  Paul’s statements are directed at those who hear, believe then go party and forget everything they just learned about the ministry and life of Jesus Christ.  It follows the same reasoning as “If your hand would cause you to sin, cut it off…” and that line of thinking.  Say for example, you’re a recovering drug addict, and you recovered because you no longer associated with people who were able to persuade you to partake.  The prudent and practical thing to do would be to no longer associate with that person.  Perhaps the temptation would be more than you could handle, and you’d fall back into habits that you fought out of.  Paul was addressing this kind of falling back into habits you kicked off.  But he was not referring to those of other faiths who wish to engage you in discussion, dialogue, and intercultural/inter-religious exchanges which may enrich you both as human beings. 

3) Ephesians 6:10-18 – Finally, let the mighty strength of the Lord make you strong. Put on all the armor that God gives, so you can defend yourself against the devil's tricks. We are not fighting against humans. We are fighting against forces and authorities and against rulers of darkness and powers in the spiritual world. So put on all the armor that God gives. Then when that evil day comes, you will be able to defend yourself. And when the battle is over, you will still be standing firm. Be ready! Let the truth be like a belt around your waist, and let God's justice protect you like armor. Your desire to tell the good news about peace should be like shoes on your feet. Let your faith be like a shield, and you will be able to stop all the flaming arrows of the evil one. Let God's saving power be like a helmet, and for a sword use God's message that comes from the Spirit. Never stop praying, especially for others. Always pray by the power of the Spirit. Stay alert and keep praying for God's people.

            This passage by far has been so horribly warped and misused.  The current challenge facing contemporary Christianity is the militarization of Christians.  Often social conservatives will misuse this and

Jesus Feeds the 5000

other verses to convince Christians that we must “fight” the heathens to change the nation to a “Christian” nation.  I believe, however that this verse details a frame of mind that a believer must have when engaging in discussion with those of other faiths and philosophies.  It is easy to forget that Christ called us to be servants, not warriors.  We serve all mankind, but we never discard why we serve in the first place.  Putting on the Armor of God is similar to emboldening yourself when you go into unknown or new circumstances.  The Armor of God analogy is designed to keep the believer rooted in what he or she believes and, to challenge believers to reinforce their faith with prayer, study, and worship.  The image created about the Sword of the Spirit is especially powerful.  I believe that Paul uses “The Sword” because he believes truth is sharper than any deceit.  And in this he is most definitely correct.  But “The Sword” is not a weapon to be used offensively, but to be used defensively.  It’s used to cut through the evil and wickedness that spews from the mouths of those who’d undermine in deceitful ways.  Jesus has never called us to be warriors, but peacemakers, diplomats, and servants of the highest caliber.  When I hear “Men of God or Women of God” calling us to go into the nations waving our Bibles like broadswords at the heathens, I cringe and wince inside.  We are not military infantry, but a collective of servants, teachers, philosophers, and caretakers. 

To wrap it up, the Christ-like Believer has been called to serve, not fight.  But he has been called to defend those who cannot defend themselves as well.  Offense and defense are two very different things.  To defend one from another means that you are putting yourself in the way to protect another, whereas with offense, you seek to impose yourself on those who do not wish to be imposed upon.  The Message of Christ has never been about imposing on others, but defending those who need defending. 

James said it best:

If you think you are being religious, but can't control your tongue, you are fooling yourself, and everything you do is useless. Religion that pleases God the Father must be pure and spotless. You must help needy orphans and widows and not let this world make you evil.

(Jas 1:26-27)

Blessings to you all!

A Gay Young Man's Mind

So looking back on my life, I first realized there was something very different about me around 7 or 8 years old. Being that age, I had no idea what it was exactly, but, looking back on it, I can tell you that from a very early age I knew I was gay. Just as much as you straight folks know your straight and you like girls or girls that like guys...I knew I liked guys. So don't go telling me it's a choice or that I can change my genetically disposed attractions, because it is not true. I do not subscribe to "pray away the gay" or reparative therapy, or having prayers offered up to cleanse me of this "corruption". It is not corruption, it is not possession, it is not a disorder. It is ME. Me, myself, and I...ME. This is who I am, and I'm happy with who I am. Granted there are days that I feel less-inclined to say that, but those are days when I feel disgruntled about being alone the rest of my life, single..etc. If you want to support me, help me, and encourage me to move forward...please, I welcome any help from anyone I can get. but you're going to disparage my relationship hardwiring, then, keep moving along and we'll talk about other things instead. 

God made me this way ladies and gentlemen, and I'm proudly going to be true to who I am. God loves all his children, Red, Yellow, Black, White, Gay, Straight, Bisexual, and Transgendered.

My goal with this particular piece is the hopes that someone who's maybe a bit more confused will read it, and understand that they are not "evil" or "corrupt" or "demonic" or other absurdities.  You're perfect exactly as you are made.  And you should be you, and don't let anyone else tell you what you should be!

~Gabe

I Want The Message of Christ Not a Message of Fear

How many of you remember going to church.  You might hear sermons that are practical, spiritual, perhaps even deeply philosophical.  Sermons are the mechanism in which a body of believers receives instruction, edification, encouragement, and reaffirmation of their shared beliefs.  But there's also a type of sermon that cheats the believer out of useful instruction, and instead, instills fear, terror, and appeals to the basest of instincts which dominate our thinking as living creatures: fear.

Fear comes in a couple of flavors.  There is healthy fear.  That is, the kind of fear that scares you away from jumping off cliffs, or taking risks which are unreasonable.  The kind of fear that drives you to honor the figures in authority such as government, elders, parents, or others who are placed in authority above you.  Then there is harmful fear, the kind of fear that manipulates your mind into doing things you may not normally consider doing.  This principle of reward and punishment psychology was corroborated by Sigmund Freud and B.F. Skinner who specialized in behavioral theory.  Human beings by nature will seek stimulus that is pleasurable and avoid stimulus which is painful.  Now, you might be asking what this has to do with sermons and Christianity.  Let's consider the styles in which ministry attempts to bring believers into the fold.

When I was a teenager, I attended a Church in Centralia, WA called First Assembly of God, of the Assemblies of God denomination.  The Assemblies of God is considered to be a fundamentalist division of Christianity...though generally non-militant.  It has churches in just about all 50 states and in over 70 nations world-wide, touting an international membership of over 60 million followers, a US membership of about 1.7 million members, 3 million adherents, and over 35,000 ministers both local and abroad internationally.  It's annual giving received exceeded $350 million in giving from it's attendees.  

The organization takes literalist positions on creation, homosexuality, and marriage...expressing those positions in line with most fundamentalist and mainstream Christian thought and reason.  It also takes fundamentalist positions on issues like sex, salvation, the roles of women, and many other issues.  While it's not out of the mainstream to express concern for one's immortal soul, this and many other organizations are too eager to embrace that method of ministry.  I heard several times in several settings, salvation being referred to as fire insurance, the "Get-out-of-Hell-free" card, or other similar slogans or catch-phrases.  

One of the many programs that were put on during the time when I was attending First Assembly was a program called "Heaven's Gates, Hell's Flames."  One of the many fringe benefits of being part of the Church's youth program is that we generally got to assist in it's production.  It's production was carried out by an organization that would cast various people in roles surrounding various what-if scripts.  What if you died today?  Where would you go?  What would or could it look like?  The skits were generally short 4-7 minutes, each of which portrayed a scenario.  When I participated in the skit's production, I did lighting for it.  One of the most memorable skits was the skit which portrayed a woman considering suicide.  It showed her sitting by herself at a table, deciding if she wanted to take her life or not.  She wrestled with the issue, and minions of Satan would dance around her tormenting her and taunting and tempting her to pull the trigger, but then she'd consider not, and leaning on Jesus for understanding.  The demons would recoil, repelled by the very mention of his name.  Then, the skit would turn macabre with the death of the woman after she pulled the trigger, taking her own life.  The skit goes dark, the stage is adjusted, and the light would come back showing her in a beautiful, golden, heavenly setting.  Then, Jesus would come out of the back atop a staircase leading in through the gates.  He looked at the woman, a sorrowful face would appear, and he'd leave, turning his back on the woman.  The stage would go dark, but then glow red, and these frightful creatures would emerge from the sides of the stage, with a bigger more menacing figure, Satan, behind them, delighting in another soul with which to torment.  The woman is dragged away screaming and thrashing as demons pull her away from the gates of heaven into the eternal hell-fires of damnation, condemned for all time to suffer.  It was indeed a frightening scene.  Dark, menacing, and outright scary.  

The event was always an annual one.  It attracted first-time attendees by way of invitation from members.  A rather aggressive publicity campaign through the Church Membership was carried out, and the pues would fill with attendees, both members and guests alike.  The staffing for the event also included trained "crisis" ministers or counselors.  The idea is that the event would startle or scare many people, then the event-trained counselors would be made available to explain what they saw and complete the conversion process.  Oddly enough, as I'm writing this section, I'm thinking back on it even more deeply, and can't really express how detestable this method of "proselytizing" truly is.

Now granted, there have been, throughout the history of Christendom and religion as a whole, fear has often been used to push religious and, sometimes in tandem, political agendas.  For example, during the 1st Crusade of 1096, Pope Urban II promised salvation to anyone who'd fight for the Church to drive the Moors out of Jerusalem.  In the 1400s and 1500s, the Church used fear to manipulate the masses to contribute money to the church by promising that souls of loved ones would be freed from Purgatory by issuing "indulgences".  During the 1500s, King Henry VIII outright promised death to any Catholic who did not renounce his oath to Rome, and who wouldn't pledge fealty to him as head of The Church of England.  And in addition many Catholics were put to death as a result of King Henry's campaign.  In Spain, the Spanish Inquisition put hundreds of Protestants to death because they failed to renounce their "heathen" ways and were burned as witches for engaging in witchcraft.  

So the Church as a long history of using fear to coerce conversion to a said organization's views.  In the modern day, as much as the Church wants to claim that it's embraced a more "free will" view of Christianity, we still see fear being used to manipulate and coerce believers into converting, or dissuading current believers from straying away from the faith.  In The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, departures from the Church would often end in a ruined reputation, denouncing from family members and your community (if it was heavily LDS), and a ruining of your livelihood.  In the Assemblies of God, doctrinal uniformity is pushed very deeply.  Dissenters are sometimes subjected to criticism by church leaders, and in the extreme case, excommunication from the organization, it's churches, events, and assistance.  Such a view was inferred at me personally for directly challenging church doctrine when I was 18 years old.  Bishop Gene Robinson of the Episcopal Church of the United States was outright threatened not by his organization, but by his fellow believers and doctrinal fanatics who believed he was stepping outside Church doctrine for attempting and succeeding to become the first openly gay member of the Episcopalian clergy.  Ministers and believers both have been subjected to fear as a means of bringing about uniformity, conformity, and religious "purity" to whatever Church organization is being discussed.  

Why is this a problem for the Church in the modern day?  Because friends, God has imparted to us a spirit which is utilized by believers to bring about change, love, compassion, and new beginnings to those we encounter.  The message of Christ has always been taught on the premise that you serve because you choose to serve.  "Come, follow me, and I'll make ye fishers of men." Matt 4:19.  Those fishers didn't HAVE to follow Jesus and learn to be fishers of men.  They chose to because they saw him for what he was: revolutionary, different, and unique.  The individuals who were touched by Christ were drawn to Christ, did so out of need, desire, free will.  Probably one of the biggest differences between the cultures of the past and today is that we've grown and evolved our understanding of the human condition.  That understanding has also led to advances in promoting free will and self-determination...a cornerstone in American Society today.

When the Church and it's leaders teach Christianity in the context of "if you don't believe you're going to Hell"...the message's purity is tainted with the act of manipulation.  The fear message panders to the human being's most basic of instincts: Survival.  Human beings will generally do all things necessary to preserve their corporeal existence.  But when religion, the teachers of the supernatural, the spiritual, and the soul begin introducing fear as their primary method of ministry, then the message of Christ turns to a message about "Love thy Neighbor" to "Worship me, or die."  Christians are appealing directly to physical instinct to preserve one's existence.  It's the most basic of manipulations, and it is an abomination of the message.  The mind has an incredible capacity to handle the prospects of pain...but when that pain or risk of pain becomes overwhelming, it will concede to the instinct to end those painful stimuli.  When Christians preach "Worship me, or die", they have appealed directly to the most basic of instincts, and is using that instinct to gain adherents.  Nothing is farther from the truth of the message, than a message of hope delivered by way of a message of fear.  And the message of fear is not what Christ created.  

The virtues of Christianity are expressed in the everyday living as human beings.  The nature of Christ is expressed in our thinking and in our actions.  The proselytizing observed today, in my view, was not the type of proselytizing that we as Christians should be involved with.  The Church's call is to serve, and serve, and to again, serve.  By serving, we spread.  By humility, we spread.  And by doing unto others, and loving our neighbors...our gay neighbors, atheist neighbors, addicted neighbors, immigrant neighbors, Muslim neighbors, Pagan neighbors, and so forth, we, by our actions spread the message.  Calling salvation "fire insurance" and condemning the actions of others serves nothing more than to pass judgment on another person's culture, religion, or upbringing.  It's up to the individual to choose to serve.  And that choice is made by seeing what Christianity can do for others...not by calling it "fire insurance" and going "thou art damned" or similar type of speech.  Jesus' message spreads by actions...not by empty, hollow, judgmental words.